NEW THIS YEAR! The schedule of technical sessions is in Sched.org which allows you to search within the schedule, filter the schedule to show sessions only occurring on a certain date, within a track, or in a room. You can also build your own schedule by creating a free account in Sched.org. Click here to return to the main Midwest Fish & Wildlife Conference website. 

PLEASE NOTE: The schedule posted here is as of 1/25/16, and is subject to change. Please check back for updates.
Back To Schedule
Tuesday, January 26 • 2:00pm - 2:20pm
The Use of Maxillae To Estimate Ages of Lake Trout

Sign up or log in to save this to your schedule, view media, leave feedback and see who's attending!

AUTHORS: William Wellenkamp*, Michigan Department of Natural Resources; Ji He, Michigan Department of Natural Resources; Darren Vercnocke, United States Fisheries and Wildlife Service

ABSTRACT: Previous evaluations of calcified structures used to estimate fish ages have not included maxillae. While otoliths are considered the superior structure for assessing the age of lake trout Salvelinus namaycush, it can be difficult to collect and analyze sufficient samples for annual stock assessment, particularly from recreational fisheries. We used maxilla sections to estimate ages of 1,145 lake trout collected from Lake Huron in 2013, including 83 fish of known age with coded wire tags (CWT). Maxilla removal was 287% faster than extraction of otoliths. Maxilla sections were cut using inexpensive tools commonly used for processing spines and fin rays. Multiple sections could be made easily from each maxilla, allowing for the use of a superior section that exhibited easily identifiable annuli; in contrast, a single cracked otolith yields only two opportunities to assign age since the cut must be made through the otolith focus. From blind estimates by two independent estimators, made without prior knowledge of the true CWT-derived ages and before the decision rules were fully developed, exact match of maxilla-based ages to the CWT-derived ages was 59–67%; agreements with a bias less than or equal to 1 year were 88–89%, and agreements with a bias less than or equal to 2 years were 94–95%. These measures were higher than those obtained using otoliths sampled from lake trout of the same CWT-derived ages. After analyzing the sources of errors and finalizing detailed decision rules, we found that all maxilla sections exhibited a full complement of annuli comparable with the true CWT-derived age, except for two samples affected by errors occurring during sample collection rather than during maxilla processing and interpretation.

Tuesday January 26, 2016 2:00pm - 2:20pm EST
Emerald A