Loading…
NEW THIS YEAR! The schedule of technical sessions is in Sched.org which allows you to search within the schedule, filter the schedule to show sessions only occurring on a certain date, within a track, or in a room. You can also build your own schedule by creating a free account in Sched.org. Click here to return to the main Midwest Fish & Wildlife Conference website. 

PLEASE NOTE: The schedule posted here is as of 1/25/16, and is subject to change. Please check back for updates.

View analytic
Monday, January 25 • 3:20pm - 3:40pm
Deer Migration and Habitat Use Within Moose Range in Northeast Minnesota

Sign up or log in to save this to your schedule and see who's attending!

AUTHORS: Amanda McGraw*, Integrated Biosciences Graduate Program, University of Minnesota Duluth; Lou Cornicelli, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources; Ron Moen, Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota Duluth

ABSTRACT: Interactions between moose Alces alces and deer Odocoileus virginianus are of particular interest in Minnesota in light of moose population declines and because of the potential for deer to negatively affect moose populations through resource competition and disease transmission. Both species use young forest as primary foraging habitat, and management to create these habitats for moose is occurring in Minnesota. Because moose and deer forage on similar vegetation, there is concern that restored habitat could lead to increased contact between the two species. We used activity data from GPS radiocollared deer (n = 53) to examine movement patterns and habitat use across multiple scales. Deer in interior northeast Minnesota displayed two migratory strategies: no migration (65%) and migration (35%). Migratory deer moved 7.7 km (range: 1.0-15.6 km) and did not leave moose range. There was no difference in migration distances between spring and fall (p = 0.77), as all deer returned to the previous year’s summer and winter home ranges. Winter home ranges during the more severe winter of 2014 (1.05 km2 ± 0.15) were smaller than summer home ranges (1.65 km2 ± 0.36) and 2015 winter home ranges (1.75 km2 ± 0.20), though differences between seasons and years were not statistically significant (p = 0.56). Use of conifer and mixed forests was higher during winter, while use of deciduous forest was predominant in summer. Woody wetlands were avoided at all times of year. Additionally, a concurrent project assessing the effectiveness of moose habitat restoration suggests overlapping occurrence of moose and deer ranging from 15-40% in areas believed to be attractive to moose because of ample forage availability. Thus, deer in interior northeast Minnesota may pose a risk to moose throughout the year in terms of resource competition and disease transmission regardless of migratory strategy.

Monday January 25, 2016 3:20pm - 3:40pm
Vandenberg A

Attendees (27)